AZ: Court rules Arizona law bars lawsuits against home sellers who don’t discuss nearby sex offenders

PHOENIX – A state appellate court says Arizona law bars lawsuits against home sellers who don’t disclose that a sex offender lives next door, but the ruling also says providing a false reason for selling is another story.

The ruling revives a fraud claim against the sellers of a Scottsdale home. The sellers had told the buyers that they were selling because they wanted to be closer to friends. However, their real reason allegedly was the sex offender next door. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I can see the validity of disclosing known hazards to the buyer, but the fact that you don’t like the guy next door, because he is a registrant, doing nothing but minding his own business, is another matter. If this jury looks at the statistics, they will find no more of a potential hazard than anyone else in the area. Maybe the seller should also know of and disclose any robbers, arsonists, drunk drivers, drug dealers or gang members in the neighborhood to the buyer?

The issue is ‘reason’ for sale….because I want too.

That is nothin’ I had a CDC Officer From Tehachapi Prison Living next door to me & when He found Out I Lived next door the put there house up for sale. Now Iwas wondering How long before it would sell so some people looked me up & my STAR was where it was supposed to be, Then I get a call that it was moved to a vacant house 2 miles away. I Freaked & called registration & said I had been told My star is NOT where it is supposed to be. They said “Yes it IS” and guess what the house sold soon after to another family. Then My Star came back to where it was supposed to be. That is when BAD thing started happening to our animals. Now if that is not a Conspiracy and some one with pull MOVIN’ Things For a home sale I don’t Know what is & I STILL have those witnesses,,Including My New Neighbor who will testify they checked the Map before purchase and there was No STAR! Yea, I straitened everything out with them but not without loss and Much anguish first,But No one will challenge My County on such an issue it would seem. Now There is another issue I Am wondering about & supposed to make a call Friday to see if it is a valid Civil Rights Issue to be challenged In My County.